Glenn Hough <gally_angel@yahoo.com>
As I sort our my impressions from Transforming
Communications, I realize that I've gone through three
distinct phases of thought concerning this
book. The first was immediate, and obvious. This book was
published by Praeger for their Praeger Studies
on the 21st century, so that must mean it's good stuff. The
books in the series I've been through already
show a distinct level of quality, so I can give this one the
benefit of the doubt already, right? And
besides, it's got Sohail's handiwork in it and we all know how
good he is, don't we? In the process of
reading, the opinion changed to the concept of a benchmark. Oh,
this is really a good benchmark for where this
particular line of inquiry in futures studies has gone
so far, or at the very least when the pieces
where written, how ever long ago that was. The third phase
is one that holds a smile at how this book has
furthered my thinking and a small smirk at how
familiar it all was. As I finished the book and
sat to reflect upon it, yes it furthers my own thinking on
these concepts, but's let be honest, this book
is like preaching to the choir, to the already converted. One
could almost say: "Yes, communication does not
equal the shear number of emails, Duh!" I don't think I ran
across anything really new, just more indepth,
greater breath, more focused than what I'd already been
learning. I get it, but then again, I'm part of
the choir. There's nothing wrong with preaching to the
choir on occasion. They need the encouragement
and the furthering of their own understanding as well.
But the real question is how does it play with
audiences that don't get it, aren't hip to what's
go'en down, and are mentally stuck in the older
paradigms? I'm afraid I'm completely unqualified to
even venture an opinion on that question. So,
after a pregnant pause, what do I think? If technology,
sustainability or future generations is of any
interest to you, then read the damn thing if you
haven't already. And if you don't, it's just
another lost opportunity to further your own understanding. Your loss, not mine, since I've read it twice
now.